Sealing Theory - (Home)
Static vs. Dynamic Sealing
Leakage Control
Lip vs. Squeeze Seals
Effects of Lip Geometries
Friction
Pressure Effects and Extrusion
Seal Wear
Seal Stability
Surface Speed
Compression Set
Influence of Temperature
|
| O-Rings,
seals and bearings for all applications |
Lip vs. Squeeze Seals
|
The cross-sectional shape of a seal
dramatically affects how it functions, especially at
low pressure. The greatest trade-off in dynamic sealing
is low friction performance vs. low pressure sealability.
At low pressure, friction, wear and sealing ability
are affected by whether or not the seal is a lip or
squeeze profile (see Figure 2-3). With this in mind,
seals are often categorized as either “lip seals”
or “squeeze seals,” and many fall somewhere
in between. Lip seals are characterized by low friction
and low wear; however, they also generate poor low pressure
sealability.
|
|
Squeeze seals are characterized by just
the opposite: high friction and high wear, but better
low pressure sealability. As described above, a squeeze
type seal will generate much more sealing force than
a lip type seal. The assumption here is that both seals
are under zero or low pressure. However, as fluid pressure
increases, the differences between seal types become
insignificant due to the force from the fluid pressure
overcoming the designed squeeze. Pressure generally
improves leakage control, but increases friction and
its associated heat, wear and potential for
extrusion.
|
In pneumatic applications, low friction
is of the utmost importance. As such, lip seals are an
excellent choice for these low pressure applications.
Conversely, in hydraulic cylinders, where high system
pressures easily overcome frictional forces, squeeze seals
are often the appropriate choice. An example of a hydraulic
application in which a squeeze seal would not be appropriate
is a gravity returned hydraulic ram. In this case, a lip
type hydraulic seal would generate lower friction, allowing
the gravity return to function properly.
|
| |
|
|